Introduction
This article will provide a quick overview of each of the F-16 Fighting
Falcon versions and what is visibly different about
them.
In the Beginning...
YF-16
There were two aircraft produced for the fly-off with the YF-17.
These were 72-1567 and 72-1568 and were recognizable by their distinctive
red/white/blue paint schemes, followed later by interesting camouflage
patterns that were never adopted.
F-16 FSD
Eight Full-Scale-Development (FSD) aircraft came next which were
used for flight test. These were 75-0745/52. Once the basic flight
test objectives were achieved and the F-16 entered production, six
of these eight aircraft went on to some other interesting duties:
- 75-0745 – first to fly with the General Electric F101
engine. The F101 powers the B-1, and the F101 DFE (Derivative Fighter
Engine) would become the F110 that would power many of the F-16C/D,
all of the F-14B/D, and even some F-15s.
- 75-0747 – transformed into the two-seat F-16XL with cranked
arrow wing, tentatively designated F-16F, entered NASA’s
test fleet as aircraft 848.
- 75-0749 – transformed into the single-seat F-16XL with
cranked arrow wing, tentatively designated F-16E, entered NASA’s
test fleet as aircraft 849.
- 75-0750 – this aircraft was the AFTI testbed and flew
extensively in a variety of configurations including with a pair
of canards under the engine intake for advanced maneuverability
testing.
- 75-0751/52 – flew with the General Electric J79 engine
installed to develop an export version of the aircraft when it
had been determined that the F100 engine was too advanced to be
exported.
F-16A/B Introduction
The
APG-66 radar of the F-16A/B was optimized for the intercept and dogfight
role. The only air-to-air missile capability was the AIM-9 Sidewinder
in addition to the M61 Vulcan cannon. The canopies of production
F-16A/B aircraft were clear, though with the introduction of the
gold-tinted canopies with the F-16C/D (designed to reduce the aircraft’s
radar cross-section), the tinted canopies quickly found their way
into the F-16A/B fleet. You’ll see many photos of F-16A/Bs
with tinted canopies and clear rear canopies as the fixed rear sections
were not changed out as quickly. Ironically, these aircraft (along
with most of total F-16 fleet) are being switched back to clear canopies
to make the aircraft night vision goggle (NVG) compatible. Landing
lights were mounted on the main landing gear on most versions of
the F-16A/B until they were relocated to the nosegear door on MLU
and Block 20 Vipers.
F-16A/B Block 1/5/10
These initial aircraft were externally identical as the production
improvements were mostly internal. Powered initially by the F100-PW-100,
these were later changed out for the F100-PW-200 in an attempt to
mitigate the stagnation stall problems being experienced by the Pratt-powered
F-15 and F-16.
F-16A/B Block 15
This was the first major visible upgrade to the aircraft with the
main difference being the horizontal stabilizers. The area of the
horizontal stabs was increased by 30% and this revised stab would
remain with the all subsequent Vipers. Later model Block 15s designated Block
15 OCU (Operational Capability Upgrade) received the more reliable
F100-PW-220 engine, AMRAAM capabilities, Maverick missile capabilities,
and provisions for the ALQ-131 ECM pod.
F-16A/B MLU
The Mid-Life Update (MLU) program was designed to extend the physical
and operational lives of the NATO F-16s. These updates include an
upgraded F100 engine, updated avionics, a Block 50-styled glass cockpit,
new HUD, relocated landing lights to the nosegear door, IFF ‘bird
cutter’ antennas ahead of the canopy, AIM-120 capability, and
FLIR-pod capability under the starboard side of the intake.
F-16A/B Block 20
These are new-build F-16A/Bs that were built to Block 15 OCU and
MLU standards.
F-16A ADF
These were production Block 15 aircraft that were modified for
the air defense interceptor role. The modifications included IFF ‘bird
cutter’ antennas ahead of the windscreen and under the intake
ahead of the nosegear, a redesigned vertical stabilizer base with
bulges on the sides to accommodate relocated hydraulics, a modified
radar to give the F-16 its first radar-guided missile capability– the
AIM-7F Sparrow, and a spotlight built into the left side of the aircraft’s
nose for night intercepts. An F-16B ADF was also developed, but its
external appearance was identical to standard F-16Bs.
F-16C/D Introduction
Engine problems with the F100 persisted, so the decision was made
to dual-power the F-16. The concept was simple – design the
airframe and the engines to be swappable, allowing for the F100-PW-220
to be swapped with the F110-GE-100 (F101DFE) as required. This would
prevent the grounding of the entire F-16 fleet as previous problems
with F100 had caused. In reality, the modular approach wasn’t
practical as the increased airflow requirements of the GE engine
required a larger inlet. As a result, aircraft were designed off
the production line to be GE or Pratt-powered, though in theory they
could be reconfigured at depot should the need ever arise.
The F-16C/D also introduced the gold-tinted canopies. These were
designed to reduce the radar cross-section of the F-16, especially
head-on. The concept was with a smaller signature, an enemy radar
wouldn’t detect the F-16 until it was much closer, and in a
head-on intercept, this was critical. In the early days of the F-16C/D,
these canopies were in high demand to retrofit the F-16A/B fleet,
but today, many of the F-16C/Ds are trading their gold-tinted canopies
for clear to operate better with NVGs.
The F-16C/D received a new radar, the AN/APG-68. This provided
better air-to-air, air-to-ground, and general navigation capabilities.
The flightpath displays in the Heads-Up Display (HUD) were revolutionary.
F-16C/D Block 25
Despite some ongoing teething problems with the F100, the first
F-16C/Ds (Block 25) were still exclusively Pratt-powered.
F-16C/D Block 30/32
This
was the first of the dual-powered series aircraft. The Block
30/32 were supposed to be capable of swapping Pratt and GE
engines, but experience with the F110-GE-100 showed the need
for a larger inlet. In the early days of operations, Block
30 and 32 aircraft looked identical except for the engine nozzles.
The Block 30 was GE-powered, the Block 32 was Pratt-powered.
While many of the Block 30s received larger inlets later in
life, there were still Block 30s flying with the smaller inlet,
so check the nozzle (or the aircraft serial number) to see
if that is really a Block 30 or 25/32.
Block 30 was the transitional airframe with the GE engine
and while initial deliveries of the type came with the same
small-mouthed intake as the Pratt-powered aircraft (also referred
to as the NSI or Negatively Scarfed Intake), later airframes
received the large-mouth inlet (also referred to as the MCID
or Modular Common Intake Duct). Some of the earlier airframes
were retro-fitted with the MCID intake, but there are still
F-16C Block 30s flying today with the NSI intake.
Initially, the Block 25 and early Block 32 were identical in appearance,
so only a check of the aircraft serial numbers would tell the difference.
The Block 30/32D introduced the radar warning receiver (RWR) antennas
on the leading edge flaps. These were not on the initial production
Block 30/32 aircraft but were later retro-fitted.
Block 30/32 Vipers more recently started carrying the Litening or
Sniper FLIR pods on the starboard side of the intake. These new-generation
pods have higher resolution and better higher altitude performance
than the older LANTIRN pods on the Block 40/42.
F-16CG/DG Block 40/42
This
was the second mission specialist version of the F-16 (the ADF being
the first). The F-16CG/DG was optimized for night operations against
ground targets while retaining its ability to defend itself against
air threats. This aircraft was designed to carry the LANTIRN suite,
a pair of pods that provided radar and FLIR capabilities that also
equipped the F-15E Strike Eagle. The F-16CG/DG was already in service
when Operation Desert Shield started, but supplies of the LANTIRN
were still limited. Nevertheless, LANTIRN-equipped Vipers demonstrated
their precision prowess on the battlefield. The radar pod is mounted
under the left side the engine intake while the FLIR pod is under
the right side. While you’ll see F-16CG/DGs flying without
pods, they’ll generally operate with just the FLIR pod installed.
In addition to LANTIRN, other external differences of the F-16CG/DG
include the unique holographic HUD and the relocated landing lights
on the nose gear door. The landing lights were originally on the
main gear, but the LANTIRN pods blocked the lights from shining ahead
of the aircraft.
Like the Block 30, the Block 40 aircraft are powered by the F110-GE-100
and all have the wide-mouth intake, while the Block 42 is powered
by the F100-PW-220 (just as were the Block 25/32) and retains the
original small-mouth intake.
Another significant difference between this block and previous
F-16s is the landing gear. Block 40/42 had an increase in payload
and take-off weight thanks to heavier duty landing gear that
was an outcome of the Israeli experience with the aircraft.
To accommodate the larger main wheels, the main gear doors
have distinctive bulges in them. These landing gear and gear
door enhancements were also applied to Block 50/52/60/62 Vipers
as well.
F-16CJ/DJ Block 50/52
As the F-4G Wild Weasel neared the end of its service life, the
USAF implemented the concept of pairing ‘manned pylons’ (F-16Cs
with HARM missiles) with the sensors of the F-4G as a hunter/killer
team. The concept proved that the F-16C could cue and fire the HARM
using directions sent from another platform. The downside was that
the F-16 couldn’t carry the sensors of the F-4G since there
was no space available inside the airframe.
The F-16CJ/DJ is a dedicated SEAD (Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses)
aircraft with the HTS (HARM Targeting System) pod mounted under the
starboard side of the intake and a pair of AGM-88 HARMs. The aircraft
received improved engines in the form of the F110-GE-129 (Block 50)
or F100-PW-229 (Block 52).
F-16C/D CCIP
The last production F-16CJ/DJ aircraft were built to Common Configuration
Implementation Program (CCIP) standards (the USAF version of MLU).
The CCIP will update Block 40/42/50/52 aircraft with common color
displays in the cockpit, updated avionics, and the ability to carry
more advanced weapons. The most distinguishable feature of the CCIP
is the addition of the bird cutter IFF antennas to the nose. The
HTS pod is relocatable to the port intake station to make room for
the Sniper or Litening FLIR pods on the starboard side. Block 40/42
aircraft will also be capable of carrying the advanced FLIR pods
as well.
F-16C/D Block 50+/52+
This is the was the stepping stone between Block 50/52 and
the then-unavailable Block 60/62 that featured the updated
avionics and weapons capabilities of the CCIP with the
option of conformal fuel tanks. The Hellenic
Air Force (Greece) selected the Pratt-powered Block 52+ to
serve as its next generation strike aircraft. These aircraft
have the same IFF antennas on the nose and color displays in
the cockpit as the CCIP. The difference is the option for conformal
fuel tanks over the wing roots that also is available for Block
60/62.
F-16E/F Block 60/62
The
F-16E/F is the designator given the Block 60/62 Vipers. These are
not currently slated for USAF service (though they’d be much
cheaper than the F-35), but are equipping the Air Force of UAE, with
more customers to come.
The Block 60 is powered by the F110-GE-132 while the Block 62 is
supposed to be powered by the F100-PW-229A (UAE selected the GE engine).
The F-16Fs have the dorsal spine that runs from behind the cockpit
through the base of the vertical stabilizer. This serves as an avionics
bay for additional capabilities for the aircraft.
The F-16E/F have the bird cutter antennas, a built-in FLIR system
in the nose, and are capable of employing the conformal fuel tanks.
Return to the F-16 Main Menu
HOME
WHAT'S NEW
REVIEWS
AIRCRAFT
ARMOR
NAVAL
SPACE
HISTORY
MUSEUM
CALENDAR
COLOR REFS
WRITERS GUIDE
TIPS
FUTURE KITS
ABOUT
READERS GALLERY
LOGOS
SOLAR MONITOR
FAQS
SPECIAL
STAFF
CONTACT
|