| Date of Review |
October 2009 |
| Manufacturer |
Revell Germany |
| Subject |
Pz.Kpfw.VI Tiger I Ausf.E |
| Scale |
1/72 |
| Kit Number |
3116 |
| Primary Media |
Styrene |
| Pros |
Nice detailing |
| Cons |
No Zimmerit as depicted in box art |
| Skill Level |
Basic |
| MSRP (USD) |
$13.20 |
Background
Tiger! There are few single words which had as powerful
an impact in the ears of soldiers on both sides during World
War II. The Panzer VI, immense, with its heavy armor
and powerful 88mm gun, is an enduring symbol of the German
army, recognizable in name if not shape even by many unfamiliar
with much of the history of the war. In his book "Patton's
Best", American tanker Nat Frankel made frequent references
to "Tiger 6s" as being the panzers he was most afraid
of.
When the war began, tanks were smaller and lighter, but then
a race developed between armor and firepower, with each side
trying to create the ultimate - the tank that can defeat all
comers and survive itself. In 1942, after some unpleasant
surprises on the Russian front, such as the T-34 and KV-series,
Germany needed a new heavy tank. Eventually the Panzerkampfwagen
VI, later to be known as the Tiger, was approved for production.
It matched up parts from two designs, the turret by Porsche
and the hull by Henschel. The front armor was 100mm,
but not sloped like on the Panther. Weighing in at 63
tons, the Tiger was not fast and maneuverable. The exceptionally
wide tracks helped reduce ground pressure, but there were places
a Tiger simply could not go. It was so wide that for
rail transport, the outer row of road wheels could be removed,
and narrower tracks fitted. As with many late-war vehicles,
the design was spectacular, but in places overly complex, and
as a result, mechanical reliability in the field suffered.
The first units were finished in August 1942, and among the
earliest appearances were in North Africa and at the Battle
of Kursk. With updates along the way, production continued
until August 1944, and 1349 were built. By that point, production
turned to the even bigger Königstiger (King Tiger) or
Tiger II.
The Kit
Revell of Germany has released two kits of the Tiger, the
early Ausf. H (which I already had in the stash) and this kit
of the late Ausf. E. The box is the usual black, but
is lid-and-tray instead of end-opening (like my H). A
quick look at the shelves at my Friendly Local Hobby Shop showed
that Revell is using more of these boxes, a welcome change.
Comparison of the two kits shows that Revell has been most
efficient in their tooling. The primary difference is
one sprue unique to each kit, containing the right turret half,
with or without the mid-late escape hatch, the cupola, front
fenders and a few other parts which changed during production. Also,
the Ausf.E, in addition to the stock rubber-tired roadwheels
on the standard sprue, includes a partial sprue containing
the late-model steel wheels.
The tracks are link and length, which is generally my preference. The
instructions are the usual Revell multiple pages on folded
newsprint, with the steps broken out in reasonable detail,
and markings diagrams for two schemes. A small decal
sheet with the ID numbers and Balkan crosses completes the
contents.
One criticism I have seen a couple of times of this kit concerns
Zimmerit, the German anti-magnetic-mine coating. The
kit does not include it either molded onto the hull and turret,
or in some mountable way. However, the cover art is of
a Tiger wearing it, as most mid- and late-period vehicles did. As
it would require separate tooling of even more parts, it is
understandable that Revell would skip it, though it is a disappointment
to the builder. The topic bears further discussion.
Zimmerit
To help the infantry, Germany came up with an anti-tank mine
that could be attached magnetically to the target, which
also helped maintain the optimal distance for the shaped
charge explosive. As standard procedure, they also
devised a counter to it, in the event any of their enemies
fielded a similar weapon. Zimmerit was a paste made from
Barium Sulfate which was intended to weaken the magnetic
attraction intended to hold the mine in place. It was
generally applied to heavier tanks and tank destroyers, and
on vertical and sloped surfaces (gravity being enough for
horizontal surfaces anyway). It was introduced in December,
1943 and applied in factories until August, 1944, though
there is some evidence that some factories phased it out
earlier. There were various methods of application, leading
to characteristic trowel patterns on the different vehicles
it was applied to.
So what does that mean for our Tiger? The early Tigers,
such as in the Ausf.H kit, were produced before the introduction
of Zimmerit, so they're fine without it, as even once it was
authorized, not all tanks in the field received it. The end
of Zimmerit usage almost exactly matches the end of Tiger I
production, so pretty much all mid- and late- models (like
the Ausf.E kit) should have it. It's certainly possible that
some were made in factories which quit using it earlier, but
I haven't seen any pictures to confirm it. It is also possible
that it was removed from some tanks, but again, there's little
or no firm data to support that.
Models of late Tigers have been built without Zimmerit for
years, and there is enough doubt about the final production
that there is no trouble justifying such a build, and leaving
it to any doubters to prove otherwise.
But if you want to show Zimmerit, what to do? Builders
in 1/35 have a great selection of options, including appliqué in
plaster, resin or photoetch, as well as tools designed specifically
for replicating the various patterns in putty or other media.
These sorts of aids are starting to become available to a limited
extent for us small-scale builders, including a photoetch set
for this kit from Extratech. The timeframe for doing this review
made that option impractical, so I decided to try manually
creating the Zimmerit.
A quick web search turned up a number of articles with a variety
of techniques, mainly consisting of either modifying the surface
of the plastic with solvents or heat, or adding a coating of
epoxy or putty and shaping it. I decided to use 3M Acryl
Blue putty and a tool carved from a stray piece of sprue. Once
the kit was assembled to a suitable stage, I went to work.
There are a couple of things to be careful of. The putty
needs to be thin enough to stay reasonably in scale, but thick
enough to replicate the characteristic trowel pattern. It’s
also important to work in sufficiently small sections that
the putty stays soft while you work. I used masking tape
to keep the putty from getting onto the adjoining surfaces.
I should probably have done more practicing on scrap plastic/kits
than I did. Still, for a first attempt, and sitting on
the shelf rather than a contest table, I’m reasonably
satisfied. Next time, I will probably look to a slower-setting
material to give longer working time, which will allow me to
get a more even, tighter, more accurate pattern.
Construction
Building begins with the lower hull, and proceeds to the running
gear. The sides of the upper hull are molded together
with the lower hull, which makes attaching the tracks a little
more challenging. The instructions do a very good job
of depicting the layout of the multi-row overlapping road
wheels, including a separate drawing as seen from directly
underneath. The tracks are depicted next, but between
the addition of Zimmerit and painting plans, I left the tracks
until closer to the end, before only the front and rear fenders
and the last detail parts: headlight, machine guns and tow
cables.
The hull parts all fit together well. I ended up adding
the side skirts earlier than I would have liked because of
the Zimmerit. The turret got built up separately along
the way, as it too, was going to get Zimmerit. The fit
was good enough that I could put the roof in place without
glue to help align the sides and gun mount, and then pop it
out so as not to get stray putty onto it. It was added
back in after the coating was finished and cured.
The tracks are link and length, and very nicely detailed. There
are plenty of extra single links, as well as seven with extra
pins to be attached to the turret sides (the Ausf.H kit only
uses five of them). Note that the tracks are asymmetrical,
the guide teeth staying towards the inside. What this
means is that the tracks are essentially oriented in opposite
directions around the wheels. The overhang of the upper
hull and side skirts restrict access to the upper run of the
tracks, which makes installation a little trickier, but not
problematically so. The links mesh together nicely,
but the fit around the sprocket and idler, and the contour
to the tops of the road wheels are a little less smooth. This
should pose no trouble to any builder who has done a couple
of sets of link and length tracks before, but if you haven’t,
I would recommend getting a couple of simpler sets under your
belt before trying these.
Colors and Markings
Two schemes are provided. The first is from Panzerabteilung
503 in France in July, 1944. It is panzer dark yellow
under an irregular pattern of panzer red-brown and panzer dark
green. The second is from Panzerabteilung 506 on the
Russian front in the summer of 1944, dark yellow with an irregular
pattern of dark green. The colors are given in Revell
colors, but since they’re the standard German armor colors,
this presents no problem, no matter what line of paints you
prefer.
The Ausf.H kit’s early schemes involve
more unusual and somewhat controversial colors, and the Revell
mixes make it more challenging. The decals are marked
as printed in Italy by Revell, though they look to me like
the work of Propagteam, and are suitably thin and well printed.
They handle well and even snuggled down into my Zimmerit with
only a moderate amount of setting solution.
Conclusion
A winner from Revell, rather accurate in dimensions and shape,
including the off-center mounting of the main gun. I
can’t speak to the newest Dragon releases, but this
beats all previous options. Between the Ausf.E and
Ausf.H kits, it should be possible to model just about any
Tiger I made. The only real drawbacks I can see are
the Zimmerit question as discussed above, and the tracks. For
a builder experienced in link-and-length tracks there should
be no trouble, though I still don’t like the outcome
as well as some other kits I’ve built. I have
to recommend that less experienced builders may want to set
this one aside until they’ve done a few tracks of this
style first.
Revell rates this kit as Skill Level 5, but their ratings
are based largely on parts count, and the tracks and the extra
set of wheels drive that count up. Aside from the tracks,
everything else goes together easily.
References: Wikipedia.com, Absolute Air Land & Sea
CD-ROM (Cassell / Tamiya), “Panzerworld”
(http://www.panzerworld.net)
and various book off the book shelves.
HOME
WHAT'S NEW
REVIEWS
AIRCRAFT
ARMOR
NAVAL
SPACE
HISTORY
MUSEUM
CALENDAR
COLOR REFS
WRITERS GUIDE
TIPS
FUTURE KITS
ABOUT
READERS GALLERY
LOGOS
SOLAR MONITOR
FAQS
SPECIAL
STAFF
CONTACT
|