| Date of Review |
June 2009 |
| Manufacturer |
Unimodel |
| Subject |
SU-100 |
| Scale |
1/72 |
| Kit Number |
334 |
| Primary Media |
Styrene |
| Detail Media |
Styrene & Photo-Etch |
| Clear Media |
N/A |
| Pros |
Nice detailing |
| Cons |
|
| Skill Level |
Basic |
| MSRP (USD) |
$10.98 |
Background
The T-34 tank came as an unpleasant surprise to the Wehrmacht. It
combined the protection of sloped armor with a fast and maneuverable
suspension, and added a 76mm main gun that could handle anything
the Germans had at that point. On top of that, the Soviets
were able to commit the resources to produce incredible numbers
of T-34s. Of course, technology never stays static, and soon
Germany was fielding new and modified designs, intended to
counter the capabilities of the T-34. Soviet designers
continuously improved the T-34, including using the hull as
a basis for other vehicles, including most notably, Tank Destroyers. Using
a fixed mounting with extremely limited traverse allows for
a simpler mounting, making it possible to carry a larger gun
with a shorter design time and easier production.
The SU-85 introduced the powerful 85mm gun, which would later
be turret-mounted (T-34/85), and this was followed by the OT-34/76 (1943)
in September 1944. The 100mm D-10s gun's extraordinarily
long barrel gave it great accuracy and penetration. 3037
were built, and it stayed in use in various parts of the world
for over 20 years.
The Kit
Inside the usual blue UM end-opening box are the usual green
UM sprues. Sprue A (2 copies) contains the wheels, track
links, grab bars, auxiliary tanks, and a few other usually
symmetric doodads. B has the lower hull and sides. Together,
these will look pretty familiar if you've seen any of the other
UM T-34 or variant kits. Sprues D and E contain the upper hull
and all the parts that distinguish the SU-100. Actually,
if you have their SU-85M (and I do), you would see that the
sprues are exactly the same ones, the differences coming in
which fenders, gun barrel and mantlet get used for each. Two
copies of F contain all the vinyl tires for the road wheels
and a couple of tow cables. Finally there is a small
photoetched fret with three parts, only two of which get used
-- the engine compartment grill cover and the ubiquitous two-man
wood saw. The third part is only used for tanks with
a hull machine gun mounted.
The standard 4-page instruction sheet includes a brief history
in multiple languages and a parts layout with unused pieces
shaded out. A small decal sheet completes the component
list. As usual, there are a few extra decals not appearing
in the provided marking schemes.
Assembly
Assembly begins with the lower hull, as well it should. With link-and-length
tracks, it is generally easier to assemble them before adding
the upper hull and fenders. In fact, it is quite possible
to work on the upper and lower hulls simultaneously, which
has the advantage of allowing work on one part to continue
while the other waits for glue or paint to dry. In this
case, I would recommend working on the front and rear halves
of the upper hull separately, not bringing them together until
it's time to join them to the lower hull, after the tracks
are in place. This gives a little more flexibility in positioning. I
ended up with a slight misalignment, and had to choose between
dealing with it at the front or back joints, not being able
to hide some of it in the middle joint.
The lower hull goes together simply, though you do need to
be careful to get the nose and tail pieces right-side up. I
like to have the major upper hull parts handy at this stage,
using a little quick dry-fitting to make sure everything is
properly squared up. Next come the road wheel axles and
front idlers. I assemble the rear sprockets, but don't
glue them on until I'm working on the tracks so I can make
sure I get them lined up right. Paint comes next, while
I can still get in, between, and behind everything. Then
the vinyl tires are added to the road wheels, which are then
mounted on the axles.
I've come to prefer link-and-length tracks, even in 1/72,
and even though the newer "rubber-band" tracks from
the likes of Dragon and Trumpeter have alleviated some of the
old problems with attachment and paint adhesion. Still,
link-and-length can be imposing until you've got a few sets
under your belt. If you've never used them before, the
UM T-34 kits just might be the best place to start. Take
your time, do one side at a time, and pay close attention to
the kit instructions, and you'll be surprised at how smoothly
things go.
After painting the tracks, in a multilayer treatment of metal,
rust, and blackwash, I start by positioning the long bottom
run, but without glue. I then start to glue the next
sections on each end, which bridge from the bottom up to the
front idler and rear sprocket. Only once I have these lined
up and attached do I go back and run a little glue to fix the
bottom run in place. Starting with the bottom means that
I will finish up on top, where any unevenness in the final
connections can end up in track sag (though less so with the
T-34 than others) and eventually hidden by the fenders and
upper hull. After the first couple of rear links are
connected to the sprocket, I run a little liquid glue into
the axle connection around back to fix the sprocket in place. Continuing
around both ends with the individual links needed for the tighter
curve, I finish up with the connection between the long top
length and one of the shorter lengths next to it. A few minutes
for the glue to set, and the other side quickly follows.
Meanwhile, the upper hull has gathered just about all of its
structural and detail parts and a coat of paint. This
way, the remaining paint work once the upper and lower are
united will be minimal, consisting mainly of touchup along
the seams. The photoetched parts are worthy of note. While
the saw needs nothing but paint, the rear engine grille requires
a partial curve. UM's brass is among the thickest I've
ever seen, so, even if you normally don't bother, I have to
recommend annealing the part. Heating the part in a candle
flame -- get it to red-hot but without letting it burn up --
and then letting it cool will soften the part and make it possible
to get a good curve of the rear half with a minimum of frustration.
Finally, the top meets the bottom, and all that remains is
some seam and paint touch-up.
Painting and Finishing
You can have your Soviet vehicle in any color you want, as
long as it's green. Well, that's not exactly true, but
it's the way to bet. There were some two-tone camouflages,
and winter white schemes, but green predominates. There
were specifications, but no matter how closely they were followed,
variations will exist. Whether due to a bad batch, bad application,
or just differences in wear and tear, two tanks sitting next
to each may be different shades.
Normally I use Vallejo's Russian Armor Green, but I like to
introduce some variation, often simply by using different undercoats
and keeping the green coat thinner. In this case, the
box art shows a lighter, browner shade which appealed to me,
so I used Pollyscale "PC-10 Drab", a British WWI
airplane color, and possibly the granddaddy (or at least grand-uncle)
of most olive drab colors used since.
The instructions include two vehicles, one from the Baltic
Front in 1944 and one from Berlin in 1945. I chose the
latter, mainly because it includes a slogan, roughly translated
as “Forward to Berlin”, painted on the right-hand
side. This would turn out to be a dubious choice. The
decals are some of UM's early type, which are very matte, fairly
thin, but with fairly wide carrier film. Generally this
isn't much of a problem if you have room to leave the entire
carrier in place, as it tapers down well in thickness towards
the edges and snuggles down to the surface pretty well. Unfortunately,
due to the location of handrails and other details, I tried
trimming the carrier down, and I got some silvering and surprising
resistance to setting solutions. The result is not too
bad, but not quite as nice as I had hoped for. Lastly,
Tamiya Weathering Master pastels were used to finish off the
look.
Conclusions
All in all, an enjoyable and recommended build. The
kit goes together quite well and appears quite accurate. Dimensionally it matches the
specifications I have perfectly, and the shape matches the
drawings and photos I have rather well, though I will admit
that I am not an expert in Soviet armor.
I love UM kits. There, I've said it. While the
moldings and engineering may not be quite up to state of the
art, they are far better than what we usually call "short-run". They're
pretty affordable, and cover subjects and variants that have
rarely if ever been kitted in 1/72, and to a reasonable standard
of accuracy. I particularly like the link-and-length
tracks. As I said above, if you've never built l-n-l
tracks in this scale, and are a little hesitant, a UM T-34-hulled
kit is probably the best place to start.
References
HOME
WHAT'S NEW
REVIEWS
AIRCRAFT
ARMOR
NAVAL
SPACE
HISTORY
MUSEUM
CALENDAR
COLOR REFS
WRITERS GUIDE
TIPS
FUTURE KITS
ABOUT
READERS GALLERY
LOGOS
SOLAR MONITOR
FAQS
SPECIAL
STAFF
CONTACT
|