| Date of Review |
July 2007 |
| Manufacturer |
AFV Club |
| Subject |
M1126 Stryker (ICV) |
| Scale |
1/35 |
| Kit Number |
35126 |
| Primary Media |
Styrene |
| Detail Media |
Styrene, Photo-etch |
| Clear Media |
N/A |
| Pros |
Excellent exterior detailing |
| Cons |
No interior |
| Skill Level |
Intermediate |
| MSRP (USD) |
$41.95 |
Background
The US Marine Corps made the leap from tracked armored personnel
carriers to their Light Armored Vehicle (LAV) in the early 1980s
in order to have the capability to rapidly deploy a combat capability
anywhere in the world without an excessive airlift effort. The
US Army was reluctant to make the switch to wheeled vehicles, preferring
instead its M1 Abrams tank, M2 Bradley APC and M3 Bradley.
When the Army's mission shifted from defending the line in Europe
to more fluid operations worldwide, they reconsidered the LAV,
only to have Congress choose the HUMVEE to meet their mobility
needs. In Desert Storm, the Rangers borrowed a few LAVs from the
Marines and found they didn't quite meet their needs.
By the turn of the century, the Army had embraced the need to
have some of its forces capable of rapid deployment into remote
areas where the transport of the M1 and M2 would be difficult and
maintenance on those same vehicles would be nearly non-existent.
A trade show was hosted to look over the available wheeled combat
vehicles to understand the state of the art and the issues in adopting
such a capability into US Army doctrine. A source selection followed
and the team of General Motors/Canada and
General Dynamics Land Systems (makers of the M1 Abrams) was selected
to tailor the GM-designed vehicle to meet US Army requirements.
The vehicle family was named for Medal of Honor recipient PFC Stuart
Stryker. The M1126 Infantry Carrier Vehicle (ICV) is designed
to carry a crew of two and a squad of nine.
The Kit
Earlier this year, Trumpeter released the first 1/35 rendition
of the M1126 Stryker IFV. We not only gave the kit a good look
(reviewed here),
we also built the model (look
here). A month or so later, AFV Club released their own
version of the kit, so we decided to give this version a look
as well.
This kit is molded in olive green styrene and presented on
eight parts trees, plus separate upper and lower hull moldings.
One tree of clear parts is provided for periscopes and lenses.
One fret of photo-etched parts is also provided as well as
eight rubber tires.
When I reviewed the Trumpeter kit, there was very little information
available to the average modeler on the Stryker but that has
since been rectified by THE reference on the subject, Wings
and Wheels Publications' Stryker in Detail.
The layout of this kit is similar to the Trumpeter kit though
for the record, this is in no way a copy of the Trumpeter tooling.
One immediate difference in this kit is the parts layout. The
upper hull of the Trumpeter kit had many of its details pre-molded
into the sides whereas the AFV kit uses laminate side parts
to capture the detailing. This isn't bad, it is a less expensive
way to tool the kit. Where the Trumpeter kit had six parts
trees and upper/lower hull parts (there were two additional
trees with rucksacks and bundles), the AFV kit uses eight trees
plus upper/lower hull.
I was a bit skeptical of how this kit would work out with
the angled hull shapes of the Stryker. AFV Club creates some
interesting kits, but having built a few, I know they can also
be a bit challenging. From my own experience, the Trumpeter
kit fell together nicely, and from what I've gathered from
others' experiences, the AFV Club builds up nicely too.
So which kit is better? That is an interesting question. The
AFV Club kit has better detailing in the M151 Remote Weapons
System, the Trumpeter kit missed the mark here.
The AFV Club
wheels and tires are evidently better as I've seen a recent
'aftermarket' product for the Trumpeter kit to correct that
kit's wheels using castings of the AFV Club's wheels and tires.
I would think that for a little more than the cost of the resin
wheels and one kit, you could buy both kits and bash the two
kits together.
The AFV Club kit does differ in some external details, but
like the Trumpeter kit, the tooling represents the vehicle
as it appeared at the time each company did their research,
and as you know, the Stryker has been significantly updated
several times since then. Whichever kit you select, you'll
have the job of configuring and updating the model to represent
the point in time you're modeling.
The AFV Club kit has fewer photo-etched parts in its offering,
consisting primarily of the intake and exhaust grilles. The
Trumpeter kit had these and cable cutters, storage racks, and
other details in photo-etch. Eduard has since released their
own photo-etch set for the Trumpeter kit (with one for the
AFV Club version no-doubt not far behind) so the photo-etch
playing field is leveled here.
One other interesting difference between the two kits is the
clear parts. AFV Club provided the periscope lenses in clear.
Given the silver-maroon appearance of the periscopes in the
actual vehicle, I don't think these clear parts offer any value
since they'll be painted up as well.
Markings
Here is where AFV Club get's my vote - the Trumpeter decals
were done with separate letters and numbers so you had the
priviledge to build up whatever serial numbers/ID numbers you'd
like. Bunk! That was one of the more painful and time consuming
decal experiences I had in some time. AFV Club provides you
with markings of a select number of vehicles without all of
the pain.
Conclusion
This will be a relatively easy build straight from the box
as this kit hasn't been over-engineered. Like the Trumpeter
kit, there is no interior provided, but also like the Trumpeter
kit, the various hatches can be posed open should you opt to
scratchbuild your own interior.
Definitely recommended!
HOME
WHAT'S NEW
REVIEWS
FAQS
AIRCRAFT
ARMOR
SPACE
NAVAL
HISTORY
CALENDAR
COLORS
TIPS
COMING SOON
ABOUT
|