| Date of Review |
July 2009 |
| Manufacturer |
Aurora |
| Subject |
Lockheed AH-56A Cheyenne |
| Scale |
1/72 |
| Kit Number |
502 |
| Primary Media |
Styrene |
| Detail Media |
Styrene |
| Clear Media |
Styrene |
| Pros |
Only kit of this aircraft produced in styrene (so far) |
| Cons |
Some shape inaccuracies |
| Skill Level |
Basic |
| MSRP (USD) |
OOP |
Background
When the US Army issued the requirement for an Advanced Aerial
Fire Support System, Lockheed won the contract with an advanced
design - the AH-56A Cheyenne. The Cheyenne was a rigid rotor
aircraft that employed fixed wings to augment lift in forward
flight and a pusher propeller that further augmented forward
thrust. The combination was to give the aircraft a 212 knot
dash capability and an impressive array of range and firepower.
A fatal crash of one of the prototypes, delays in the development
schedule, and the general political climate of the day led
to the cancellation of the production contract, followed shortly
thereafter with the cancellation of the overall program. The
Army regrouped and issued requirements for a more conventional
attack helicopter, and that competition led to the current
AH-64 Apache.
The Cheyenne was indeed an advanced design. Its main rotor could
still function like any other helicopter, but it didn't require
the aircraft pitch changes to accelerate and decelerate, thanks
to the pusher propeller. The pusher had full pitch control so
it could adjusted for different levels of forward thrust, reverse
thrust (for rapid deceleration) and in beta for normal deceleration,
all without moving the nose off target. The aircraft was armed
with a 20mm cannon in a ventral turret, additional firepower
in the nose turret, an array of rockets, missiles, and external
fuel tanks under its wings. Unlike many attack helicopters, the
Cheyenne also featured retractable landing gear to further reduce
drag.
The Kit
Strange and wondrous things arrive at the in-box of Cybermodeler
and here was one of the bigger surprises. Reader Klaus Lehmann
sent in this Aurora 1/72 AH-56A Cheyenne for us to compare
with the recent Anigrand Craftswork kit. What is surprising
is that anyone that has wanted one of these gems knows that
they command a hefty price on the collectors' market. If you're
reading this Klaus, vielen Dank!
Molded in tan styrene, this kit was designed as a quick build
which was ideal for younger modelers. As you
can see in the photos to the right, the kit is simple in layout.
Having spent some time with the Anigrand kit and lots of photos
of the several prototypes on display, I had come to the conclusion
that it would be far too much work to fix that kit. You can
read that review here.
So when Klaus sent this kit along, it was worth doing a comparative
look.
After spending some time with this kit, I found that the Aurora
and Anigrand kits have some interesting similarities and differences.
Here is the summary:
- It appears that the molds for the Anigrand kit were based
upon the Aurora kit. There are a few differences to allow
for casting in resin versus injection molding.
- The fuselages are essentially the same dimensions and shape
except for the main rotor fairing - the Aurora kit's fairing
is wider - and the Aurora kit has the ventral antenna housing
that is missing on the Anigrand kit.
- Both kits have engine intakes that are too small.
- Both kits
have the same squared-off exhaust duct found on the early
configuration Cheyenne where the later configuration had
the slight sugar scoop fairing.
- Neither kit have fuselage detailing for the APU or avionics
bay ventilation.
- Both kits have the same integral wings and sponsons, which
unfortunately means that both kits have the stub wings attached
at too shallow of an angle incidence.
- The Anigrand main rotor head seems to replicate the later
configuration where the Aurora rotor head is configured with
the early system. The Anigrand rotor head was sectioned and
integral with the rotor blades where the Aurora rotor head
is molded separately from the blades making the Aurora rotor
head easier to build and much less fragile.
- The Anigrand canopy in my sample had a fatal air bubble
in the windscreen section where the Aurora canopy has ejector
pin marks in that spot as well as on the rear of the canopy.
Markings
The kit provides markings for the prototype aircraft 66-8826.
Conclusion
So if you're wondering if the Aurora kit was more accurate
than the Anigrand offering, it is probably a safe bet that
the Anigrand kit is based upon an Aurora kit. Can you accurize
either kit? You bet. The Aurora kit will be easier to modify
as a styrene kit, but a skilled modeler could also apply the
same updates to the Anigrand kit. If you do elect to modify
either kit, the best thing to do is create several vacuformed
canopies out of an Aurora canopy and go from there.
HOME
WHAT'S NEW
REVIEWS
AIRCRAFT
ARMOR
NAVAL
SPACE
HISTORY
MUSEUM
CALENDAR
COLOR REFS
WRITERS GUIDE
TIPS
FUTURE KITS
ABOUT
READERS GALLERY
LOGOS
SOLAR MONITOR
FAQS
SPECIAL
STAFF
CONTACT
|