| Date of Review |
December 2006 |
| Manufacturer |
Hobbycraft |
| Subject |
F9F-2P Korean War Panther Recon |
| Scale |
1/48 |
| Kit Number |
HC1457 |
| Primary Media |
Styrene |
| Detail Media |
Styrene |
| Clear Media |
Styrene |
| Pros |
Simple build, positionable wing fold, flaps, lots of armament |
| Cons |
|
| Skill Level |
Basic |
| MSRP (USD) |
$24.98 |
Editor Note: This preview has been updated to show the box art
and decal information, courtesy of Hobbycraft Canada.
Some time ago, we heard that Hobbycraft Canada was planning a
release of the Grumman F9F-2 Panther in 1/48 scale. Later we learned
that Trumpeter was also releasing an F9F-2. There was some conjecture
that Trumpeter was doing a competing release, but as the dust settles,
we have learned that the Hobbycraft and Trumpeter Panthers are
one in the same tooling - a collaborative effort.
Part of the delay has been to try to get the best tooling possible
- they wanted to get this one right. It looks like the effort paid
off.
Note: You may have seen photos of a build-up of this kit
out on the net and it looked like the model had (among other things)
a big bubble canopy. It is likely that this was a build-up of an
earlier test shot of this kit because many of the concerns I had
with this release went away when I received this test shot, courtesy
of Hobbycraft Canada.
Note: This is still a test shot, albeit one
of the latest, but what you see here may still change by the time
the kit hits the streets in early 2007.
So what do we have here? The Panther kit is presented on three
parts trees molded in light gray styrene. A fourth tree contains
the windscreen, canopy, and other clear parts. I've imaged the
first two trees front and back for your inspection. Let me apologize
about the wing tree - I had the parts in-hand with 'Corky' Meyer's
F9F Panther Part One (Naval Fighters #59, Ginter Books) and diverted
to my work bench. I started through the list of things I thought
I'd seen in that build-up photo and compared the sprues to the
photos in the book. Then I had the Monogram F9F-5
out on the bench and was doing some eyeballing of the similarities
and differences. Before I knew it, I was starting to assemble both
kits with Tamiya tape to do a proper three-dimensional comparison
before I remembered I hadn't even photographed the bloody sprues!
Fortunately I had only pulled three parts off the Hobbycraft/Trumpeter
trees for the inboard wing section.
So what did I find out? First, the kit is beautifully done and
tapes together nicely. The wing/fuselage fit is nice even with
tape!
I saw some concern over the intakes being too small being expressed
on some of the message boards. The lower edge of the of the intake
should be more parallel with the underside of that section of wing
as is the top edge. That would carry the opening of the intake
out a little further. As I said earlier, this is still a test
shot and there may be changes, but even if it doesn't, you have
two choices:
- Take 30 seconds with a file and adjust the
shape of the intake yourself
- Cut away the intakes
back about 1/4 inch and graft on the intakes from the Monogram
kit
According to Corky Meyer, the F9F-2s were retrofitted with
the same intake/wing fence arrangement as the F9F-5 as it reduced
the approach speed of the modified aircraft by 13 mph - a good
thing when landing on the carrier! Check your references to see
which intake arrangement was on the F9F-2 you're modeling.
The fuselage halves of the F9F-2 and F9F-5 kits align rather nicely
which highlighted the only major shape difference - the height
of the vertical stabilizer which was correctly shorter on the F9F-2
and looks good against the photos and drawings in the book. You
can see in the image above how the two partially assembled fuselages
compare as well. The nose of the F9F-2 is molded separately and
as you can see in the first two parts photos, the gun nose and
photo nose variants are there. I don't know if both will be provided
in the production release of the kit, but you can see the layout
here.
The other area of interest was the windscreen and canopy. That photo
on the net gave the impression of a big honking bubble canopy,
but not so. You can see here that the canopy is properly profiled
and aligns nicely with the windscreen. When compared to the Monogram
canopy, the shape difference is instantly visible as is the thickness
of the Monogram canopy. The Monogram parts each have one of the
molding tabs still present so you could tell them from the Hobbycraft/Trumpeter
parts. Kudos to the Hobbycraft/Trumpeter team on the canopy.
The windscreen comparison was far more interesting. When comparing
the Hobbycraft/Trumpeter and Monogram windscreens to the photos
in Corky's book, the Monogram windscreen is WAY off. It is too
short from front to canopy bow. It shouldn't arc up at the front
either. In the grand scheme of things, this would be classified
as a nit.
The Hobbycraft/Trumpeter windscreen gets the shape and proportions
right from what I can glean from the photos. I might retrofit
my Monogram F9F-5 with one of these windscreens. The only glitch
I could find was simply where the top of the flat plate glass panel
frame terminates. It should terminate directly into the canopy
bow, but it comes just short of the bow and a small frame connector
links the glass panel frame to the canopy bow, MiG-style. You REALLY
have to dig to see this minor glitch.
No instructions or decals came with this test
shot as they will differ between the Hobbycraft and Trumpeter
boxings anyway. What these releases will have in common are a nice
selection of bombs and HVAR rockets for underwing stores, the
option of folded or flight-positioned wings, positionable wing
flaps, and positionable canopy. The intakes do feature separately
molded intake trunks.
I noted in one of Corky's reviews of another F9F-2 kit that it had an F9F-5
cockpit tub as the F9F-2 had 'stepped' side consoles whereas the
F9F-5's consoles were flat. This kit features the proper 'stepped'
consoles.
If you haven't read any of the Ginter Books'
series on the Panther/Cougar, you might ask who Corwin 'Corky'
Meyer is to have an opinion on the Panther. If anyone is qualified
to speak on the aircraft it would indeed be the man who first flew
the aircraft and continued to flight test the various updates to
the airframe as Grumman's chief test pilot.
Decals
In this release, Hobbycraft has provided markings for four aircraft:
- F9F-2P, 123461, VC-61, PP/72, USN, as flown by Lt JA Berger
- F9F-2P, 123595, VC-61, PP/155, USN, 'Life'
- F9F-2P, 123536, VC-61, PP/154, USN, 'Look'
- F9F-2P, 123708, VC-61, PP/153, USN, 'Pic'
Conclusion
Overall, this looks like it will be a simple build and the fit
of the parts I test-fitted was excellent, especially at the wing
roots. Look for a number of decal options from both manufacturers
as well as from the aftermarket sector as well. This should be
a popular kit when it hits the streets and if the final version
builds as nicely as this one, I'll be stacking a several up in
my own collection!
For a look at how the model goes together, look here.
My sincere thanks to Hobbycraft
Canada for this sneak peek!
HOME
WHAT'S NEW
REVIEWS
AIRCRAFT
ARMOR
NAVAL
SPACE
HISTORY
MUSEUM
CALENDAR
COLOR REFS
WRITERS GUIDE
TIPS
FUTURE KITS
ABOUT
READERS GALLERY
LOGOS
SOLAR MONITOR
FAQS
SPECIAL
STAFF
CONTACT
|